Did Andrew McCabe re-write Strzok’s notes!

According to Mike, former Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Andrew McCabe altered far left FBI investigator Peter Strzok’s notes on his interview with General Michael Flynn.

And then McCabe destroyed the evidence.

This comes after Byron York reported that former FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers Flynn did not lieunder oath.

Then Flynn was indicted by the Mueller witch hunt months later for lying.
What changed?         According to Cernovich Andrew McCabe altered Strzok’s 302 reports — then destroyed the evidence.

In March he’ll retire with 1.8 million in pension, paid by us, the taxpayers.

He needs to be fired and put in prison, not nobly retired.

Mike Cernovich      @Cernovich

Huge scoop. Like my other big stories (Susan Rice, security clearances, Conyers) will take media a long time to confirm.

You know how Peter Strzok’s system didn’t back up.

You know why?

McCabe altered his 302 of the Flynn interview, and deleted all history of revisions.

***********************************************

The FBI cannot provide a *clean* history of revisions for the 302 interview with General Flynn.

That’s why Judge Emmett Sullivan, who is very tough on unethical prosecutors, had ordered the Special Counsel to disclose exculpatory evidence, which would include these revisions.

The IG knows McCabe changed Peter Strzok 302 / notes with General Flynn.

Yet issuing a report to this effect would call thousands of FBI investigations into question.

It’s full on freak-out mode, as no one know how to spin this.

************************************************************

Why did a federal judge order Muller to disclose exculpatory evidence AFTER Flynn pled guilty?

Do you know how unusual this is? Flynn waived the right to exculpatory evidence in his plea deal.

That’s because the 302 was altered, and everyone knows it.

**********************************************************

Who is Judge Emmett Sullivan?

*This* is Judge Sullivan:

“A federal judge took the extraordinary step of naming a special prosecutor to investigate whether the government lawyers should themselves be prosecuted for criminal wrongdoing.

Read and see the rest at:  Altered Notes

 

Previous articleSo much for Guns what about Knives?
Next articleSheriff says we need GUNS in Schools!
The Real Side
Posts categorized under "The Real Side" are posted by the Editor because they are deemed worthy of further discussion and consideration, but are not, by default, an implied or explicit endorsement or agreement. The views of guest contributors do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of The Real Side Radio Show or Joe Messina. By publishing them we hope to further an honest and civilized discussion about the content. The original author and source (if applicable) is attributed in the body of the text. Since variety is the spice of life, we hope by publishing a variety of viewpoints we can add a little spice to your life. Enjoy!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.