Feminism not really feminism?

A student recently criticized Columbia University’s culture of “intersectionality,” saying it “excludes” pro-life feminists, Zionists, and others who don’t fit the feminist agenda.

In an op-ed for The Columbia Spectator, Noa Rubin, a dual-degree student at Barnard College and the Jewish Theological Seminary, recounts the disillusionment she felt when she learned that many of Columbia’s clubs target Israel.

“As a Jewish student who identifies as a Zionist, I felt unwelcomed by the network at ‘Disorientation.’ When I first got to Barnard, I was very excited to join No Red Tape (a club dedicated to ending sexual violence) and get involved with a campus Black Lives Matter partner,” she writes.

However, she says her eagerness quickly turned to dismay. After asking clubs what their recent accomplishments were, Rubin found that “many of them targeted Israel, presenting an affront to this [Jewish] part of my identity,” adding that “More recently, I find myself being excluded from feminist discussions because I am a Zionist.”

In 2015, seven student clubs at Columbia formed the Barnard Columbia Solidarity Network (BCSN). In uniting under the BCSN, the varying student groups vowed to endorse each other’s goals in a true stand of “intersectionality.” Soon after, Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) joined, citing the “interlocking and overlapping nature of struggle.”

The fallout, as other students lament, is that many campus clubs now alienate Jewish students.

Student support of No Red Tape, for instance, dropped tremendously after the club endorsed SJP’s platform, and when the club later requested that Columbia student council members publicly endorse their platform, the request fell on deaf-ears.

This brand of intersectionality, in which all causes commit to each other, is highly exclusionary, Rubin told Campus Reform, noting that the BCSN is the cause of much of her consternation.

“The loudest voice [on campus] is a particular brand of progressivism: that of the BCSN,” Rubin asserted, adding that she is “tired of my voice and ideology being written off because I was the wrong kind of progressive.”

Ultimately, as an intersectional feminist herself, Rubin hopes that the campus climate changes.

“In my opinion, intersectionality done right is radically inclusive,” she said. “This is why I love intersectionality and hold to it as one of my highest ideals, especially as a feminist.”

True intersectional feminists, Rubin argued, don’t exclude women based on politics.

Read the rest at: Feminism

Previous articleDid the Shooter have help?
Next articleConservatives NOT allowed on College editorial board!
The Real Side
Posts categorized under "The Real Side" are posted by the Editor because they are deemed worthy of further discussion and consideration, but are not, by default, an implied or explicit endorsement or agreement. The views of guest contributors do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of The Real Side Radio Show or Joe Messina. By publishing them we hope to further an honest and civilized discussion about the content. The original author and source (if applicable) is attributed in the body of the text. Since variety is the spice of life, we hope by publishing a variety of viewpoints we can add a little spice to your life. Enjoy!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.