Going Galt: Ayn Rand’s Advice On How to Pick a President

An election campaign is not the time to teach people the fundamentals of political theory, and a candidate is not a teacher.

In March of 1964, Ayn Rand published an essay titled “How to Judge a Political Candidate.” Her points resonate 52 years later:

  1. A candidate’s overall philosophy isn’t as important as their political philosophy
  2. They’re being elected for a specific job, not philosopher King
  3. A vote for a candidate is an endorsement only of their basic principles
  4. The essential issue: statism VS freedom
  5. “If a candidate evades, equivocates and hides his stand under a junk-heap of random concretes, we must add up those concretes and judge him accordingly”
  6. “An election campaign is not the time to teach people the fundamentals of political theory, and a candidate is not a teacher”

If you’re a freedom-loving and liberty-minded individual, the fundamental approach to a candidate must be to evaluate how involved they think the government should be in our lives. Regardless of rhetoric, emotion, and appeal, this is foundational. Rand was right.

Thanks to Jonathon Hoenig of CapitalistPig for pointing this out.

Reposted courtesy of Michael Hausam via HausRules.

Previous articleCity council blasted over new gun regulation.
Next articleWhy Cruz’ ‘New York values’ statement mattered
The Real Side
Posts categorized under "The Real Side" are posted by the Editor because they are deemed worthy of further discussion and consideration, but are not, by default, an implied or explicit endorsement or agreement. The views of guest contributors do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of The Real Side Radio Show or Joe Messina. By publishing them we hope to further an honest and civilized discussion about the content. The original author and source (if applicable) is attributed in the body of the text. Since variety is the spice of life, we hope by publishing a variety of viewpoints we can add a little spice to your life. Enjoy!


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.