Do you wonder why our military personnel are unarmed on US soil? I did. A loyal listener forwarded this article to us. It explains how we got to this point… kind of. Honestly, it doesn’t make much sense and there doesn’t seem to be any rationale to the decision, no “trigger” event (can I say that?) or explanation as to how it even became a topic of discussion. But here’s the history of it nonetheless, courtesy AmericanThinker.
******************************
Last year, radical Muslim Nidal Hasan murdered 13 unarmed American soldiers and wounded 30 others.
Thank you, George H.W. Bush!
Yesterday, radical Muslim Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez murdered four unarmed American soldiers.
Thank you, George H.W. Bush!
Yes, it former President Bush whom we must thank for this, for it was he who put into place a regulation stating that American soldiers off the frontlines, for the most part, must be unarmed. (Clinton perpetuated it, but Bush started it.) That makes them sitting ducks for a single radical Muslim with a gun, who can casually go and shoot one soldier at a time, knowing they can’t fire back.
It appears this “gun-free zone” type policy can actually be traced back to Department of Defense (DoD) Directive 5210.56, signed into effect in February 1992 by Donald J. Atwood, deputy secretary of defense under President George H.W. Bush. The controversial directive states that “it is DoD Policy” to “limit and control the carrying of firearms by DoD military and civilian personnel.”
The blood of the dead soldiers is on his hands. I’m sure that as he lies in the hospital with a broken neck bone, he’s not giving it a second thought.
But what is not widely known are the reasons why Bush signed this order…
Read the rest at AmericanThinker
Photo credit Marines
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.