Tuesday, August 23, 2016

The Altered Dem universe


And now, more proof that we are no longer Americans. We are Democrats or Republicans, PERIOD!
This past week, according to many reports, flooding in Louisiana is the worst natural disaster since Hurricane Sandy.

As is the norm these days, the loons on the far Left and mainstream media rallied to the president’s defense. “He can’t be everywhere all the time,” “His presence would only make things worse,” “Nothing can move when he is on the ground.”  They sound like valid defenses, right?

Notice I said this flooding is the worst since HURRICANE Sandy. The President hasn’t (or hadn’t made a statement at the time of this writing) made a personal visit to view the situation in Louisiana. He’s playing golf on Martha’s Vineyard, you know, and probably has bad cell service, or something! His people probably have it handled, just hopefully not the same ones that handled Benghazi or Fast and Furious or… never mind.

After the Katrina disaster, the Left was spouting, “People were drowning. And the president of the United States was playing guitar in San Diego!” But nothing about Mr. Oblamo’s golf game. Chris Rock once said the Obamas were like the Mother and Father of our country. Is this really how a father would care for his kids in need or in crisis?

US News wrote: “Americans across the country were shocked by the television images they saw in Katrina’s immediate aftermath. People stood on rooftops waving their arms and pleading for help as the flood waters inundated their communities,” “Making matters worse was that 67 percent of New Orleans was African American and 30 percent of the residents were poor, creating the impression that the government was insensitive and neglectful of minorities and the less fortunate.” They went on to print,While all this was going on, the president of the United States remained aloof from the disaster. Day after day, George W. Bush continued a long-planned vacation at his 1,600-acre Prairie Chapel Ranch in Crawford, Texas, and his staff didn’t want to burden him with detailed information about the situation on the Gulf Coast.”

As I have always said the Left doesn’t want justice or equality they want control. They want to control what you see and what you digest to make your decisions. That piece could be written today as:  “Americans across the country were shocked by the television images they saw in the immediate aftermath of the flooding. People stood on rooftops waving their arms and pleading for help as the flood waters inundated their communities,” “Making matters worse was that 67 percent of New Orleans was African American and 30 percent of the residents were poor, creating the impression that the government was insensitive and neglectful of minorities and the less fortunate. While all this was going on, the president of the United States remained aloof from the disaster. Day after day, Mr Obama continued a long-planned vacation in Martha’s Vineyard honing his golf skills, and his staff didn’t want to burden him with detailed information about the situation on the Gulf Coast.”  But you won’t see anything like this!

A black president WOULD care if 67 percent of New Orleans was African American and 30 percent of the residents were poor. He would be all over this, right? I know he is a busy man with a stressful job and he just needed some time away to think and relax. Maybe like when the American journalist was beheaded he would have at least driven his golf cart to the podium, put on a suitcoat, and simply made some kind of statement. “Our Hearts and prayers go out to the people of Louisiana. I have instructed my staff to do whatever it takes to get you the help you need to get to safety and save whatever you have left.” And maybe, “I was thinking of sending Border Patrol there since they aren’t working at the border, but we didn’t have enough funds to transport them since it costs over $30,000 per refugee to process them and we have lost track of over 100 thousand of them. Well gutta go now. I’m way past tee time!”

Anyway you get the picture. Show you care! He doesn’t! George W, decided to do a flyover to see firsthand what had happened instead of relying on mainstream media and he got blasted. The story went on to say: “Many Americans saw the photo of him flying over the devastation in Air Force One which was widely disseminated, as evidence that Bush was too distant from the misery below. Bush would later conceded that allowing the photo to be taken was a “huge mistake” because it made him seem “detached and uncaring.”” A little side note here, the current White House gives out pictures and narratives to the press that THEY want distributed. President Obama always looks great. Puzzling!?

The paper goes on to say: “Bush declined to visit the devastated area right away. White House aides said at the time that Bush didn’t want to cause disruptions in rescue and recovery efforts by diverting security and communications to himself. But Bush allies privately conceded that he could have quickly visited somewhere along the Gulf Coast with minimal disruption, perhaps a staging site, to show solidarity with the victims.” Curious. Couldn’t the modern day reading look something like: “Obama declined to visit the devastated area right away. White House aides said that Obama didn’t want to cause disruptions in rescue and recovery efforts by diverting security and communications to himself. Conservatives crying foul say that he could have quickly visited somewhere along the Gulf Coast with minimal disruption, perhaps a staging site, to show solidarity with the victims.”

People get a clue! The mainstream media wouldn’t call out Hillary or Obama or any other high-ranking official if they were caught beheading Christians themselves, or if they hand carried the ransom money to Iran, or if they had video of Hillary giving the order to erase, erase, erase.

This country is in a world of hurt. For the first time in my adult life I am very concerned for its future.

Americans, don’t stop fighting!

Strangers recruited from dog parks are going to teach your children!

teacher, students, classroom
teacher, students, classroom

A shortage of teachers in California has the Fresno, Calif. school district seeking potential teachers at local dog parks, Starbucks coffee shops, grocery stores, and even Mexico. They plan on hiring over 300 teachers in the 2016-17 school year. Are these people even qualified?

With an already regressing education system due to implementations such as Common Core, can we trust these new recruits to provide our children with a quality education?

Cyndy Quintana, a human-relations director, plans on taking an aggressive approach in order to ensure that Fresno’s school district is no longer depleted. She states “There is a teacher shortage, but Fresno is… being creative.”

How creative are they getting? The district is going so far as recruiting underpaid teachers from Mexico. One recruit admits: “I’m struggling right now with my English, so maybe those students are also struggling.”

Would you trust your child’s education with a recruit who can hardly speak English?

Read more about this story at EAGnews

Photo Credit: Paul Hamilton

Hillary Clinton disrespects rape victims

Hillary Clinton, giving speech
Hillary Clinton, giving speech

Perhaps one of the most prominent stances that presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton is known for is her fight for women’s rights. From equal pay to her coined phrase “you have a right to be believed,” Hillary appears to be a candidate that truly dedicated #I’mWithHer to not only herself but to the women of America.

However, her supposed sympathetic character once again proved to be deceiving. After posting a hopeful quote for rape victims on her website’s home page, Clinton’s staff later took it down. It seems as though Hillary is getting into the habit of “deleting” her problems.

The quote “you have a right to be believed” was dedicated to rape victims in Hillary’s speech in which she stated: “I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault: Don’t let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed.”

However, after the history of sexual assault allegations against Bill Clinton surfaced, as well as Hillary’s vicious attacks on those victims in attempts to cover for her husband, the quote was quickly taken down. Why? Because Hillary can’t stand by her word, as her quote would also have to apply to the women who accused Bill of assaulting them. It wasn’t just Bill who discredited them… she did too… and it was done very publicly. Doesn’t everyone have a right to be believed now, Hillary?

Judging from the monetary settlements awarded to several of the victims, it looks like the Clintons believed them. They just didn’t want everyone else to.

Read what Hillary had to say about deleting the quote: National Review

Picture Credits: Gage Skidmore

Is American Athlete Gabby Douglas Unpatriotic?

US Gymnastics Girls
US Gymnastics Girls

For two weeks in the Olympics Games, the best athletes of the world gather in one city to compete against each other. They work hard for years just to have to chance to bring home a medal that not only represents their personal talent, but brings pride and honor to their country. In the recent Rio Olympics, the young ladies of the gymnast team have brought pride and honor to the USA by winning a gold medal.

For Gabby Douglas, one of the American gymnasts, this would be her second time representing her country and lift its name high with three gold medals. However, the media is not commenting on her performance, but criticizing her for not placing her hand over her heart during the National Anthem.

Tweets like that one focus on whether her arms are on her side or not, accusing her of being unpatriotic. Douglas was forced to apologize.

Not everyone agrees with this denunciation and feel that Douglas has nothing to apologize for. They believe that it is not mandatory to place a hand over the heart during the National Anthem, unlike the Pledge of Allegiance, where people swear loyalty to America.

Moreover, Douglas had a very hard path to her quest to Rio.

She changed coaches during the U.S. Olympic trials, which was a shock to many in the gymnastics community and a sign of possible turmoil. Still, she made the return trip to the Summer Games, which is an extremely rare feat …

Instead of giving up, she proved that those who doubted her place on the American team after all her trials were wrong.

Besides, supporters argue that, not only once but twice,

Gabby Douglas, like her teammates, has made America look like a winner. That’s fairly patriotic, no?

Most how to stand in respect during the National Anthem when they are children. What have you been taught?

Do you think that placing your hand over your heart during the National Anthem is required and reflects patriotism?

Read more at Teen Vogue and Yahoo Sports

Photo credit: Twitter/jvwid

Obama’s opinion on Hillary: THEN and NOW

Clinton, Obama
Clinton, Obama

It is common to hear politicians speak against one another, especially if they are running against each other. But how common is it for politicians to sincerely change their mind about another colleague over time?

Obama, for example, did not have a high opinion of Hillary when they were opponents in 2008. Now, after 8 years, he speaks wonders about her.

In 2008, both Clinton and Obama wanted to be the Democrat nominee in the presidential election that year. And in order to sell themselves as the best the choice, they each spoke viciously about why their opponent should not be president.

Obama did not hesitate to tell everyone that Hillary had a questionable track record as Senator. He mentioned in one speech that Clinton:

took money from financial folks on Wall Street and then voted for a bankruptcy bill that makes it harder for folks … to get a fair shake.

[And she] says she is voting for the Columbia trade deal. Turns out her top adviser, her top strategist was working for the Columbian government to get the bill passed.

[Clinton also] has taken more money from lobbyists that any other candidate democratic or republican.

Clinton is now the Democrats candidate this presidential election, and Obama spoke at the Democrat National Convention about why she is the best person to replace him as President.

He mentioned that Hillary has a lifelong track record that shows:

[her] Fighting for higher wages and better benefits and a fair tax code and a bigger voice for workers and stronger regulation on Wall Street.

And most importantly, he stressed that

She got specific ideas to invest in new jobs, to help workers share in their company’s profits.

After comparing Obama’s contradictory opinions about the current Democrat nominee, people should wonder whether the President was sincere when spoke at the DNC.

Does he really believe that Clinton has changed in the last 8 years or was his loyalty to the Democrat Party that made him say:

There has never been a man or a woman, not me, not Bill [Clinton], nobody- more qualified than Hillary Clinton to serve as President of the United States of America?

Watch video in Facebook

Photo Credit to C-SPAN

Once a Clinton, Always a Clinton. Where did the Nuclear Codes go?

Bill Clinton, speaking
Bill Clinton, speaking

Former President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton seem like a perfect pair. Do these two compete against each other in losing the trust of the American people? A former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman (in the department of defense), exposes some of the mishaps that occurred during the presidency of Bill Clinton. The codes used to carry out nuclear protocols went missing during Clinton’s presidency, however, “The codes were actually missing for months.” 

In his book Without Hesitation, General Hugh Shelton explains that even though there is a perception that the President always carries the codes around his neck, his aides are the ones who carry the codes for him.

Once asked for the codes, Clinton realized he didn’t have them. Although officials say that it is incredibly difficult to carry out a command, it is a “serious breach.” 

While the President was given new codes within minutes, his failed realization for their loss is concerning.

It just gets better, doesn’t it? Bill’s lost nuclear codes. Hillary’s lost emails. Hopefully, the next thing they lose is the election.

Read what else Gen. Shelton recalls from the Clinton presidency CNN

Picture Credit: Gage Skidmore


Hillary “surges” in FAKE polls

Hillary Clinton, Sideview
Hillary Clinton, Sideview

It doesn’t come as a surprise at this point when Hillary is caught in another one of her lies. Her surging 18 point poll lead has suddenly disappeared. Why? Because it wasn’t real to begin with!

In a more recent poll, Clinton and Trump are in a “statistical tie” and some speculate that the fake poll was used to attract voters in the first place. The 18 point lead is now down to a mere 3 points, “looking at the actual poll, Trump has moved so close to Clinton, the results are within the margin of error.” 

With Libertarian Gary Johnson thrown into the poll, even less voters would cast their allegiance with Hillary.

Read more about Hillary’s fake poll at TruthFeed

Picture Credits: Yaquina

IRS goes for Olympic gold


Since August 5th, the best athletes of the word have reunited to compete against each other at the Olympics and Paralympic Games in Rio, Brazil. People at home watch expectantly the performance of their countrymen since these athletes also represent their country and each award brings honor to the country.

The Internal Revenue Service is also very interested in the medals that each athlete receives, and not because they’re bringing honor to America’s name. It cares because, thanks to the “victory tax” it collects 39.6% of the money that the US Olympic Committee grants each awarded American athletes.

Although Congress disproves of this tax, the bill that would prevent the IRS from taking a cut of the Olympic prizes has not being passed.

“Our Olympian and Paralympic athletes should be worried about breaking world records, not breaking the bank, when they earn a medal,” said ‎Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., commented that:

“These Olympians, who often become role models for younger athletes across the country, dedicate years of their life and own money representing the United States on the world stage. The least we can do in return for these athletes’ commitment and patriotism is to allow them to keep what they’ve earned during the Olympic Games,” Thune said

The US Olympic Committee awards $25,000 for those athletes who win a gold medal, $15,000 for those who win silver, and $10,000 who win bronze.

For example, gymnasts Simone Biles won 4 gold and 1 bronze medal. She will receive $110,000 and must pay the IRS $43,560.

Olympians and Paralympians are full time athletes. This is their job. They dedicate a lot to improve their craft and deserve the monetary awards granted by the US Olympic Committee.

“In no way do we think we are under-appreciated, but it goes a long way for us,” said Andrew Weibrecht, who won a silver medal at the 2014 Sochi Games. “A lot of us have families, and this is our living.”

Read more at The Western Journalism

Photo Credit to US Army

Western media’s latest propaganda campaign

Propaganda Boy, Syria
Propaganda Boy, Syria

Western media has received video and photos of propaganda from alleged “activists in Aleppo”. And western media is spreading this propaganda like wildfire.

Fact: The Obama admin wants Assad out so that the current democratic system of government will be replaced with an Islamic one.

The photos and video are faked and are propaganda — they are not worth feeling pity over — they are meant to trick you. This propaganda is designed to make you think “Government Forces” or “Russian Air Strikes” have hit civilians. This is a lie. Instead of pity, feel outrage that your media is part of Obama’s propaganda campaign.

Take a good look at the video. At the beginning of the video, the little boy is handed from the dark. You are not shown the rescue.

The young boy, who “appears” to be wounded, sits quietly, not crying, in a spotlessly clean ambulance. Let me tell you, the ambulances in war-torn Aleppo are not spotlessly clean – real ambulances are battered and war-torn and show evidence of it. Real ambulances receive bloody casualties non-stop and they cannot be kept spotless.

In the video, the little boy is placed on a chair where he then sits unattended. There are no attempts to soothe him, no one looks at his “wounds”, let alone attends to his “wounds”. No, the little boy is put on the chair, where he is then on “display” for you, the westerner. He is made to look small and lonely — while about 15 men take photos of him.

That is not what the real people of Aleppo do.

The little boy touches the “wound” on his head, sees that he has disturbed the “red paint” and looks a bit worried he might get in trouble for wiping it off. He does not look alarmed that he has “blood” on his head, nor does he cry — because he knows it is not blood.

For those of you who have kids, you know that if they saw blood coming from their head, they’d be frightened, and most kids would start crying. This little boy knows he disturbed paint.

And for those of you who know head wounds, even the most minor ones, they bleed a lot. This is a staged head wound.

There are about 15 men standing around the scene. Again, this is not typical in an actual bombing site. In Aleppo, civilians are keen to be helpful and are always tending to friends, family and neighbors. Or they are out looking for them. And there are always women around — but not in this scenario – because its faked.

This was filmed in an “opposition” held neighborhood, where it could be staged, and that is why there are no women. The “opposition” are Islamists.

Added to that, in the original video, which I’ve seen, you hear the men say Allahu Akbar repeatedly (they’ve now added sound that covers up the voices). The only people who say Allahu Akbar are terrorists. I have never, in all the years of reporting bomb sites and the aftermaths of bombings, have ever heard civilians say Allahu Akbar. They may say, Oh God (yah-rob), or Thank God (al-hamdililah), but they do not say Allahu Akbar.

At one point, you see a person in the background wearing a White Helmet. And there you have it: the final damning evidence that this is yet another staged propaganda video created by the notorious White Helmets.

The propaganda media sites send out these types of videos whenever they are losing a battle, or, when the terrorist groups they represent are killing civilians and they want to blame it on the “regime”.

The only groups that target civilian areas are the “opposition” groups, which are all foreign Islamic mercenary groups. The Syrian armed forces do not target their own family, friends and community. Syrians are fighting foreign terrorist groups, not their own people.

Who are the White Helmets?

The White Helmets was not created by Syrian nationals, nor does it serve the interests of the Syrian state or its people. The White Helmets was created by a collaboration of Islamists inside the US and UK in 2013.

The White Helmets claim on their social media sites that they are “nonpartisan” rescue workers. But their photos always show them conducting “rescue” work in “opposition” held areas that have been destroyed months or years earlier and are locations that civilians evacuated. These locations are perfect for their “staged” propaganda photos.

The White Helmet “rescue” workers shown in their propaganda photos have been filmed socializing with opposition, participating in civilian executions, and waving al-Qaeda, al-Nusra and other “opposition” flags.

It has been repeatedly proven that the “rescue” workers are members of the opposition and that they stage the photos. Often the same photos are shown repeatedly year after year, with new claims that they are separate events and in different cities (see photo examples at CheriBerens.net).

Since its creation, every White Helmet report demonizes and blames Assad, using the propaganda terms “regime forces” or “government forces” and encourages western intervention.

White Helmet reports have made it into the Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, New York Times and many other mainstream media reports. Though they have a website, they are most active on Twitter and Facebook, and this is where mainstream media usually takes the false claims and then reports them as “truth”.

Video:  YouTube

See the full article and more photos at CheriBerens.

Hillary donates charitable sum…to herself

Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton

Crooked Hillary is at it once again as she is being investigated by the FBI for the second time. According to a released donation report from 2007-2015, Clinton’s charitable donations went to… The Clinton Foundation! Are we surprised?

Just how much did Clinton “donate”? Only a mere $18 million. Talk about corruption in politics.

Click here to view the full donation report: TruthFeed

Picture Credits: NeverButterfly

When a liberal college is not liberal enough

Gay pride, college students
Gay pride, college students

Why do we never see students from the Right complain about “oppression”? It’s because the Left seems to have a problem with everything, even something that is in their favor. Oberlin College, ranked in the top 13 of the most Liberal colleges in the United States, apparently reeks of “white privilege” and “institutional racism.”

Students at Oberlin College, also known as one of the most gay-friendly colleges in the U.S., complain about “transphobia” and are hurt by their straight friends who do not address them by preferred pronouns. Some students speak of the college as having a “sinister atmosphere where bigotry still flourishes.” 

So despite being ranked the most Liberal, gay-friendly college, the main aspect of the institution that stands out is its oppressive white-privileged students?

However, queer students aren’t the only ones offended by the “blatant” racism on campus. Apparently, the campus food, which has too much cream in it, specifically caters to the white student population. Why? Because “Black American food doesn’t have much cream in it.”

What’s next, complaining that painting the walls white is blatant racism,too?

Read more about why Oberlin College isn’t “liberal enough” at CampusReform

Picture Credit: Steve Baker

UC Davis Chancellor’s Retirement Rip-off

UC Davis, California, Linda Katehi
UC Davis, California, Linda Katehi

**** UPDATED 8/19/16 ****

Schools needing money is an omnipresent topic, and the specific subject of college tuitions has been and is a focus of presidential candidates.

In my commentary titled, “Where College Tuition Goes” one of the mentions was UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi. Katehi is one of 10 University of California chancellors. The L.A. Times repeatedly reports her annual salary at $424,360 — plus hefty benefits.

Katehi gained the spotlight with the Sacramento Bee reporting in March that something was smelling foul at UC Davis.

It was discovered that in addition to receiving $424,360 for what most would think is a full-time job, she was getting another annual stipend of $70,000 from DeVry Education Group. DeVry is an online college degree program that was being sued by the federal government for defrauding its students – and we now know Katehi knew it.

There’s more. The Sacramento Bee also published that Katehi received a three-year income from textbook publisher John Wiley and Sons in the amount of $420,000 — another $140,000 per year.

The math is easy. Kathei was raking in $634,360 plus perks.

Janet Napolitano, carrying political experience but no educational experience, was oddly dropped into the cushy spot of the president of the state’s UC system.

Earlier this year, Napolitano lauded Katehi for doing a great job, and even though she hadn’t made the proper disclosure, Kathei was sorry, Napolitano protected her, and all was well with the world.

The matter did not go away, as investigations continued into Kathei’s cover-up of details of a campus protest where students were pepper-sprayed and the discovery of her nepotism and intervening into salaries of family members.

The Times this week said: “The report painted a picture of a chancellor so obsessed with her public image that she insisted on hiring public relations firms to improve it even after a 2012 UC study found the pepper-spray incident was not harming the campus’ reputation.”

Taxpayers paid that massive tab, as well.

The investigation’s report says Katehi “misinformed” Napolitano about DeVry. Additionally, she had joined the board of King Abdulaziz University in Saudi Arabia, knowing the swirling allegations that it “improperly inflated its research statistics.” There was no mention of how much money Katehi is receiving for that position. The negative finding involving the university was a “failure to show ‘diligence and judgment.’”

UC spokeswoman Dianne Klein said:

“Chancellor Katehi has engaged in a pattern of misrepresentations, … has repeatedly exercised poor judgment when confronted with challenges, has consistently disregarded the impact of her actions on the campus and the university as a whole and has failed to mitigate troubling management practices.” She continued: and “This behavior is not fit for a UC chancellor or anyone in a leadership position.”

When I read the headline that this woman had resigned, I was thrilled for the everyday Jane and Joe Taxpayer who are on the hook, with absolutely no say-so in the process, to pay for this massive debauchery. At last a bureaucrat had been held accountable and was out the door.

All of this joy was quashed when reading the final story parts wherein Katehi refused to resign, letting everyone know she would sue to keep her chancellor position.

Apparently these malfeasants have a “right” to take a faculty position even though they have been found to be liars, incompetent, unfit, etc.

Thus a deal was made.

Katehi will not sue, will be on administrative leave (i.e. vacation) for one year fully paid with her full $424,360 salary (surely with all benefits in place), along with her promise to return to a guaranteed job for at least one year as a faculty member with a salary to be determined at that time.

In the meantime, taxpayers can pay that and yet another person to assume her title.

The final slap in the face was and is with California politicians pretending like all of this a good deal.

To wit, among others there is Assemblyman Kevin McCarty, D-Sacramento, and Assemblywoman Catharine Baker, R-San Ramon, robotically offering that “the resignation would give UC Davis a fresh start.”

Considering an unfit, untruthful, incompetent state bureaucrat is on a one-year, fully paid vacation amounting to $424,360, in cash, plus a whole bunch of perks and a guaranteed job with a salary to be determined … what “resignation?”

Think about this when you hear about the high price tag on tuition, when politicians claim “free college is a right” or the latter being retitled as a “debt-free” college.

Free is never free. There is always a cost to someone who must pick up the tab.

Presently the U.S. college loan debt is $1.3 trillion. Of that amount, $125 billion was borrowed by people who have defaulted on any payment whatsoever for at least the last year.

It’s pretty clear that they are hoping the government will forgive their loans and put taxpayers on the hook while the takers skate. They seemingly have no compunction for sticking you and me with their obligations and commitments.

My kids and I paid their college debts. How about you and yours?

UPDATE 8/19/16: Katehi’s base annual UC salary was $424,360 not $474,360. I have also just learned UC Chancellor Dirks’ UC annual salary is $531,939. Dirks is staying in place until his replacement is found…..and the hits just keep on comin’!

Photo credit Wikimedia/KianaHooper

Conservative Comedian Evan Sayet: FREE LIVE TAPING AUGUST 27TH!!

Evan Sayet
Evan Sayet

FOLKS! It’s time stop letting the Liberals control the entertainment narrative. You can help! Here’s how…


2 and 5 pm — El Portal Theater in North Hollywood.

Email me at contactevansayet@gmail.com for free tickets and please SPREAD THE WORD.  We need a packed house (400 seats each show) for both the energy and the aesthetics when the cameras — any one of SEVEN of them — scans the crowd.

We always complain that there’s no conservative-themed entertainment out there in the mainstream. Well, THIS IS IT. This is a BIG BUDGET, seven-camera shoot of my HBO-style stand-up comedy special ala Bill Maher, Chris Rock, Sarah Silverman, et al and it’s FROM THE RIGHT. and I NEED YOUR HELP.

EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU should come out — and bring a friend or three or five — to help me pack the four-hundred seat El Portal Theater for two separate shows back-to-back to be edited into one hour-long stand-up special.

This is being produced and directed by LIONEL CHETWYND and,, in its own way, may be one of the most important conservative efforts of recent memory as, since, in the words of Andrew Breitbart, “pollitics is downstream from culture,” this concert video is intended to pierce the stranglehold the left has on political satire and destroy the Leftist created myth that only Liberals are smart, funny and creative or that there’s simply no audience for conservative entertainment.

Again, I NEED YOU — and it’s free!!! Please help me pack the room for both the energy it brings and for the aesthetics of the audience shots. Imagine if the camera turns for reaction shots and there are empty seats. Liberals will have a heyday with that.

Evan at KTIE

No more talk, I NEED YOU!!! Lets make this HUGE!!!

For FREE TICKETS, please email me at contactevansayet@gmail.com.

PLEASE SHARE — BOTH THE INFO AND THE URGENCY — with EVERYONE on your various lists and in your various clubs. Seven-hundred-plus seats is a LOT to fill and I NEED YOUR HELP.

Reposted with permission from Evan Sayet

Biden says Trump can’t be trusted with nuclear secrets, Promptly reveals nuclear secrets

Joe Biden, Brain
Joe Biden, Brain

We’ll have more on Joe Biden’s foolishness tomorrow, but this had to be reported on as quickly as possible.

Vice President Joe Biden appeared with Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Monday at a campaign event in Scranton, PA. During his speech he said a handful of ridiculous things, but today we’re going to focus on one particular set of comments. During his anti-Trump, pro-Hillary tirade, Biden veered a bit off course when he began to speak about Mr. Trump being unfit for the presidency. I don’t mean to suggest that he accidentally articulated that Trump was unfit, that was obviously on purpose. I mean he veered off his planned course just after calling the GOP candidate untrustworthy to lead.

Here’s what Crazy Uncle Joe said:

“Someone who lacks this judgment cannot be trusted… there’s a guy that follows me, right back here (pointing at said man) has the nuclear codes. So God forbid anything happened to the President and I had to make a decision, the codes are with me all the… He is not qualified to know the code! He can’t be trusted!”

Biden then went on to argue that Donald Trump had made life more dangerous for all of our soldiers serving overseas…

OK. Here’s the thing…

We all know that Biden is a clown, right? I mean, here he is attempting to make an argument that Trump is unfit to lead, but instead what he really does is remind us of how terribly unfit Hillary Clinton is.

Think about it…

First, he argues that Donald Trump cannot be trusted with nuclear secrets as he stands there telling everyone (as he points at the man) who the guy is that has the nuclear launch codes! Also, he’s telling us that Donald Trump cannot be “trusted” with our secrets while standing in front of (and supporting) the woman whose criminal negligence saw our secrets handed to our enemies on a silver platter. How can anyone honestly make the argument that Hillary Clinton is MORE TRUSTWORTHY than any other living human being? It’s insanity.

Secondly, he argues that Donald Trump has made and will continue to make the world a more dangerous place for our soldiers. Sadly,  Biden fails to see the irony of his commentary. Under the Obama/Clinton regime of the last eight years, the world has become a demonstrably more dangerous place for our military men and women. The President’s real world foreign policy failures have seen the collapse of several nations that were stable the day he took office and are in chaos as he leaves office. Our soldiers were safer in Iraq and Afghanistan on the day President Obama first stepped into the Oval Office than they are in those nations today. There was no terrorist threat from Libya, Syria, or Egypt back then… but now there is. Lebanon, Turkey, Iran are all more dangerous than they were 8 years ago. In fact, the one country that Obama and Clinton have called a success, Yemen, has collapsed into Civil War and seen terrorists take charge of half the nation.

While Joe Biden is busy arguing that Donald Trump is unqualified, untrustworthy, unstable, and unfit… he is literally describing the very best arguments we could be using against Hillary Clinton.

By Author Onan Coca
Reprinted with permission courtesy Constitution.com via LibertyAlliance.

Police officer performs act beyond call of duty

Teddy Bear
Teddy Bear

Steve Dunham, a local Ohio police officer was not expecting to serve his community like this on July 7th. Standing on a busy intersection, a 7-year-old boy clenched his beloved teddy bear hoping to make some profit selling his stuffed friend. Yes, it’s cute. But not for the right reasons. According to Officer Dunham, the little boy’s stuffed animal was his only hope for a few dollars to buy at least a candy bar.

Doesn’t every kid want to buy a candy bar? Sure. But not every kid is starving.

Going above and beyond his call of duty, Officer Dunham approached the young boy, but it wasn’t to buy his teddy bear. “It broke my heart,” he stated. The two headed toward a local Subway and “said a little prayer and ate dinner together.”

That wasn’t Officer Dunham’s only kind act. After taking the little boy back to the police station and asking where his parents lived, fellow officers went to the house to find four other starving siblings and a house full of empty liquor cans. Upon examining the rest of the house, their decision was clear. The two parents were arrested.

Aside from the obvious concern, it is important to recognize the kindness of the officer who, on top of his day-to-day duties, quite possibly saved the lives of five starving children.

Read more about Officer Dunham’s encounter with the little boy at WashingtonPost.

Picture Credit: Stevie Brown

‘Of Two Evils, Choose Neither’


You may have seen the meme come across your social media feeds. It’s a quote by the fiery preacher and great 19th-century theologian Charles Spurgeon: “Of two evils, choose neither.”

I get it. I love reading old Spurgeon sermons and very much appreciate his godly wisdom. I’ve actually posted this quote on my own social media and felt pretty stinkin’ self-righteous about it.

Then it occurred to me. Is it really that simple? Is “choosing neither of two evils” always the right choice? Is it always the wise choice? Is it always the moral choice? What if, God forbid, something like this happened: Let’s say that devout Muslims capture you and your family, hold a gun to your head and say, “You have one of two choices: We will either behead your children, or, alternatively, we will cut off your foot, patch you up and send you hobbling along your way. Choose one. If you refuse to choose, we will choose for you.”

That’s evil. Both choices are evil. Would you “choose the lesser of two evils,” or, as Spurgeon suggests, would you “choose neither,” thereby sealing your fate and that of your children?

“But that’s an unfair analogy!” you say.

OK, I disagree, but let’s try another one.

“Imagine our two families are miles from land in a sinking boat,” writes pastor John Barber (no relation) at The Aquila Report. “Suddenly, out of the mist, come two boats to save us. One is captained by an adulterer; the other is captained by a thief. Which boat will you get into? You say, ‘Neither one. I’m waiting for the evangelical boat which is captained by a devout Christian who will end abortion.’ I say, ‘You’re kidding, right?’ You reply, ‘Both these guys are reprobates and I’m not going to choose between two evils.’”

To expand on pastor Barber’s analogy, let’s say that the boat with the thief is worse than first thought. As it approaches we immediately discover that it’s crawling with pirates and that if we come onboard, our doom is assured. This certainly limits our options, doesn’t it? What now? Does getting on board with the adulterer mean we support adultery, or does it simply mean that, despite his moral failings, we believe he’s better equipped to get us to safety?

Indeed, we are on a fast-sinking boat in shark-infested waters, and we’re miles from shore with but two boats from which to choose. One of those boats is captained by a thief and full of pirates. The other boat, while certainly imperfect and captained by a fallen, sinful man, at least offers some chance at rescue.

“But there’s a third choice!” you say.

Sure, there may be a few pieces of driftwood floating about that represent options three, four or five, but we all know that a piece of driftwood has little chance of saving our families – especially with hungry sharks circling. You may choose a piece of driftwood out of principle, but are you willing to stake the lives of your family on what you perceive as the principled stand?

Doesn’t seem that principled to me.

These are perilous times, and we’ve got difficult choices to make. When we’re sinking, sometimes God sends us a boat with a reprobate at the helm. He has a history of doing quite a lot with reprobates.

Will He this time?

God only knows.
Pray hard.
And then pick your boat.

Matt Barber is founder and editor-in chief of BarbWire.com. He is author of “Hating Jesus: The American Left’s War on Christianity,” a columnist, a cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war. (Follow Matt on Twitter: @jmattbarber).


Milwaukee rioters, incensed over police shooting, hunt down, attack white people

Image via Breitbart via LibertyUnyielding
Image via Breitbart via LibertyUnyielding

Expect a reaction from Barack Obama, who after all is half-white, in 5, 4, 3, … er never.

Several videos recorded during last night’s riot in Milwaukee, following a shooting death by police of an armed black suspect in flight, appear to show blacks hunting down white passerby and attacking them.

Multiple videos recorded by locals show a crowd of people apparently checking the race of passing drivers when deciding what cars they should attack. A collection of these videos were combined and uploaded to LiveLeak Sunday morning.

“Is they white?” someone can be heard shouting with regard a passing motorist.

“Yeah they white, get they ass!” shouts another. The shouts continue, with one crowd member saying, “Hey, they beating up every white person!”

The crowd appears to surround a certain car and strike at it, though the video makes it hard to see what damage, if any, is being inflicted.

Later, a rioter shouts bluntly, “He white, beat his sh*t, bitch!”

Read the rest at:  RIOTERS

NeverTrump Conservatives: Time to rethink this, because every vote counts

Veterans For Trump, Sign
Veterans For Trump, Sign

The election is winding to a close, with Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton as your nominees for Republican and Democrat parties respectively. Some of the latest polls show Clinton has been leading, not by much, but enough to take the election. Regardless of what people may say, I truly believe that every vote counts and we need the conservative vote.

I don’t think I personally have ever seen such a divided Republican party where people are willing to throw away an election just because of principles. And Donald Trump has never told anyone to give up their principles.

He is not a Rabbi or priest, but he is the tough guy who is blunt and not afraid to hold people accountable for their actions with facts. He is not part of the good ol’ boy crew of GOP establishment… which the establishment hates. If I remember correctly, we are all on the same team.

NeverTrump people seriously need to look at themselves and ask are they willing to give this election to a pathological liar, who has no remorse for her lack of leadership at Benghazi? Remember, the 4 Americans who died for their country were not Muslim.

One who has no problem using her private sever for top secret info where she could have gotten hacked, and then deletes the information. She has already put the country in a national security risk.

Why focus on what Trump has said rather than on what Clinton has done? Why is she not held accountable, like Snowden and others?

Now, at one time, I admit I was a NeverTrumper when I originally endorsed Ted Cruz. After Cruz has dropped out (and yes he dropped out and is now running for senate) at first I did say NeverTrump. Then I thought long and hard about this and realized… you know, none of us are perfect. We are human. And yes we make mistakes and say things we don’t mean, just like Trump.

But his mistakes are nothing compared to the fatal mistakes Clinton has made. We need to swallow our pride and do the right thing. And voting for Trump is voting your conscious because it will not allow Clinton to have more power to do more harm.

If you absolutely cannot vote for Trump, then at least stop bashing him. Because when it comes down to it, every vote counts and it is logic and math that if you are not for him you are for her. Think outside the box and think for yourself. Do your own research and vetting that is not part of the biased mainstream media.

I have found out that Trump has done so much for Americans of all kinds, including Jews, vets, blacks, etc. I took the time out to even talk to my mentors as well as watch what they had to say about Trump and they are far more conservative than I. I believe he can possibly make the United States united again as well as Make America Great Again!

Photo credit GageSkidmore

Trump leading 67% to Hillary’s 19% in national poll of 50,000 voters

Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Poll
Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Poll

Ever since the Democratic Convention, the only poll results being reported by the liberal mainstream media show that Hillary Clinton is slowly pulling ahead of Donald Trump. Of course the same liberal mainstream media had been conducting a biased editing and reporting campaign to show Trump in a bad way and glorify Hillary.

They edited his comments about the Muslim parents of whose son was killed in action while serving in the US military. Trump stated about the mom not speaking, the liberal media intentionally edited out when Trump stated that that’s what others have written. They made it to look like those were Trump’s own words.

Now all of the controversy surrounding the way liberals have twisted Trump’s comment about people who value the Second Amendment. Hillary and even the Kennedy family have twisted it in such a way as declare Trump is inciting violence in some form. However, none of the same liberal media, nor Clinton nor the Kennedy family mention the fact that Hillary once stated that Obama could be assassinated.

The sad part is that so many people today believe everything they hear and see from the liberal mainstream media. They take the reports as gospel.

Did you know that in most of the polls, where they are reporting a Clinton lead, are conducted in such a way as to bias the outcome? Often, they only poll 100 up to 1,000 people. Not only are their sample sizes statistically small, but they often poll areas that are known to be predominately Democratic, hence, it only makes sense that Hillary is ahead.

But you probably have not heard about one poll that was recently taken where they polled 1,000 people from every state. Yep, 50,000 people were polled. They intentionally called 33% Republicans, 33% Democrats and 34% Independents and the results were so astonishing that none of the national liberal media have dared to report it.

The poll  was conducted by a group of graduate students and we first noticed it at the Arizona Freedom Alliance. According to their post:

” We’ve been telling you the difference between a media poll and an internal poll.  Media polls are driven by the desire to achieve a certain outcome.  That is why you think Hillary is leading Trump by 10 points.  If you were paying attention, one of these polls had Hillary up by 15 points before the GOP convention.  After the convention, Trump was up 15 points, a 30% jump!  Statistically impossible.  After the democrat convention, Hillary was up 10 points, a 25% swing.  Again, can’t happen.  The media is jerking our chain.  DO NOT believe them.  The only polls that can be believed are internal polls that are rarely made public.  While the poll below is not an internal poll, it was done in a most interesting manner – with no perceived bias.  And it is YUGE!”

“And by the way, it nearly mirrors what internal polls are showing.  By any accurate measure, Hillary is NOT leading Trump in the minds of the voters.”

‘We have just completed our own poll since we cannot get factual information from the mainstream media!! We called 1000 homes in each of the 50 states and asked basic questions on the economy, terrorism, immigration and presidential pick.”

“Economy was the number one factor that Americans are concerned about and terrorism was number two.
Presidential pick was Trump by a large percentage.
Trump 33478 votes 67%
Clinton 9788 Votes 19%
Undecided or other 6739 votes 13%”

“My friends and I are all Graduate students from all walks of life.  We meet to discuss stuff… 13 people who like and have served in the Military. It took us most of two weeks to be sure our calls were to all people and not just one party or another.  We called Americans.. our poll is by taking registered voter lists and we accumulated 33% repub, 33% dems and 34% ind.. our poll consisted of 1000 calls per state. all 50 states. 50,000 people are in this poll not the 100 like other polls.”

“Please everyone copy and paste to your status so everyone knows that the other polls are rigged!”

Can you imagine if word got out about the results of this poll, which was conducted with a 50 to 500 times larger sample size than most of the national polls and was conducted equally among Republicans, Democrats and Independents.

They have asked that everyone share their results so please do. Let America and mainstream liberal media, and especially Hillary Clinton know that Trump has a HUGE lead over her in one of the largest independent polls conducted. Let’s blow the liberals out of the water.


Author R.L. David Jolly holds a B.S. in Wildlife Biology and an M.S. in Biology – Population Genetics. He has worked in a number of fields, giving him a broad perspective on life, business, economics and politics. He is a very conservative Christian, husband, father and grandfather who cares deeply for his Savior, family and the future of our troubled nation.

Reprinted with permission from Constitution.com via LibertyAlliance

Did Khizr Khan get paid $375,000 for speaking at DNC?

Khizr Khan, DNC
Khizr Khan, DNC

In the article “Small” facts that Hillary did not mention about Khizr Khan, I mentioned that Khizr Khan, the Gold Star Father who spoke against Trump at the Democrat Convection, has some suspicious connections with The Clintons.

He has strong ties to the Saudi Arabian government, who, by the way has donated a lot of money to the Clinton Foundation. Besides that, Khan’s former workplace, the firm Hogan Lovells, manages the Clintons’ taxes. Also, Hogan and one lawyer from the firm had the patent of the infamous email filtering program used by Hillary Clinton.

A screenshot floating around the internet shows that there is another possible connection between The Clintons and Khan. On August 1st, The Clinton Foundation supposedly paid $375,000 to Khan’s personal law firm.

Amount DepositedIt’s hard to see, but the amount is for $375,000 and it’s from the Clinton foundation

Although this payment could be the product of the law firm’s legal service to the multi-million dollar foundation, the date of the payment could very well indicate that Khan received monetary compensation for speaking against Trump at the DNC.

No one can deny that Khan’s son is a military hero. He gave his life for his country. But his speech may not only be motivated by the memory of his son. Whether Khan was paid for speaking against Trump or not, the fact remains there is still a strange connection between him and Hillary. And this connection could easily have influenced Khan’s speech against Trump.

Read more at Conservative Daily Post

Photo Credit to C-SPAN

Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become a Real Side insider.