For many weeks now, people have been exposed to the controversial emails of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton posted on WikiLeaks. Recently, folks have read about the DNC’s favoritism for the bigger donors and opposition to its own popular member, Bernie Sanders.
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, assured in an interview with ITV that he had gathered enough information about the Clinton Foundation, among other things, that can:
provide enough evidence to see Hillary arrested.
In this interview, he also emphasized that the current administration has not been firm enough with the former Secretary of State. While whistleblowers were prosecuted due to mishandling classified documents, she used a “nonsecure channel” to transmit classified information and was not even indicted.
“[Attorney General Loretta Lynch] is not going to indict Hillary Clinton. It’s not possible that could happen. But the FBI could push for new concessions from the Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment.”
After all the information about Hillary’s dirty dealings published on WikiLeaks, it is not surprising that she was so interested in prosecuting Wikileaks since the 2010 U.S. embassy cables scandal. Why wouldn’t she want the truth to be published, unless she has something to hide…
Photo Credit to Gage Skidmore